DeepSWE is a software engineering benchmark released by Datacurve AI in May 2026, designed to address contamination and specificity problems in existing benchmarks like SWE-bench. It evaluates coding agents on 113 original, long-horizon engineering tasks drawn from 91 active open-source repositories.
SWE-bench has been the dominant coding agent benchmark since 2024, but it has two well-documented problems:
| Model | Score (pass@1) | Cost per task |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5 | 67% | $7.23 |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 59% | ~$12 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 30% | ~$4 |
| Kimi K2.7 Code | 31% | ~$3 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | 12% | $9.48 |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 8% | ~$2 |
| Gemini 3.x Flash | 5% | ~$1 |
GPT-5.5's 67% at $7.23 per task makes OpenAI the clear value leader on DeepSWE. The gap between Opus 4.8 (59%) and Sonnet 4.6 (30%) is large — suggesting long-horizon engineering still strongly favors larger models. DeepSeek V4 and Mistral have not been evaluated on DeepSWE v1.1 as of June 2026, leaving a gap on the leaderboard.
Most models score 20-40 percentage points lower on DeepSWE than on SWE-bench Verified. This gap is the benchmark's point — it removes the contamination and over-specification that inflate SWE-bench scores. DeepSWE scores reflect what agents can actually do on novel, realistic engineering tasks.
| Benchmark | Task source | Contamination risk | Task realism |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | Hand-written functions | High (widely shared) | Low (isolated functions) |
| SWE-bench | GitHub issues/PRs | High (in training data) | Medium |
| DeepSWE | Original, written fresh | None | High (long-horizon, real repos) |
Tokoscope attributes costs by endpoint — see exactly what each coding agent run costs before scaling. Free to start.
Get started free →