← Back to articles Blog

DeepSWE: The Coding Agent Benchmark That Fixes SWE-bench's Blind Spots

Emmanuel Ekunsumi · 4 min read · 2026-07-25

DeepSWE is a software engineering benchmark released by Datacurve AI in May 2026, designed to address contamination and specificity problems in existing benchmarks like SWE-bench. It evaluates coding agents on 113 original, long-horizon engineering tasks drawn from 91 active open-source repositories.

What's wrong with SWE-bench

SWE-bench has been the dominant coding agent benchmark since 2024, but it has two well-documented problems:

How DeepSWE works differently

DeepSWE leaderboard (as of June 2026)

ModelScore (pass@1)Cost per task
GPT-5.567%$7.23
Claude Opus 4.859%~$12
Claude Sonnet 4.630%~$4
Kimi K2.7 Code31%~$3
Gemini 3.1 Pro12%$9.48
DeepSeek V4 Pro8%~$2
Gemini 3.x Flash5%~$1

GPT-5.5's 67% at $7.23 per task makes OpenAI the clear value leader on DeepSWE. The gap between Opus 4.8 (59%) and Sonnet 4.6 (30%) is large — suggesting long-horizon engineering still strongly favors larger models. DeepSeek V4 and Mistral have not been evaluated on DeepSWE v1.1 as of June 2026, leaving a gap on the leaderboard.

Why these scores look lower than SWE-bench

Most models score 20-40 percentage points lower on DeepSWE than on SWE-bench Verified. This gap is the benchmark's point — it removes the contamination and over-specification that inflate SWE-bench scores. DeepSWE scores reflect what agents can actually do on novel, realistic engineering tasks.

DeepSWE vs other coding benchmarks

BenchmarkTask sourceContamination riskTask realism
HumanEvalHand-written functionsHigh (widely shared)Low (isolated functions)
SWE-benchGitHub issues/PRsHigh (in training data)Medium
DeepSWEOriginal, written freshNoneHigh (long-horizon, real repos)

Track coding agent costs per task

Tokoscope attributes costs by endpoint — see exactly what each coding agent run costs before scaling. Free to start.

Get started free →